"The best lack all conviction
and the worst are full of passionate intensity"

W.B Yeats - The Second Coming

Showing posts with label journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label journalism. Show all posts

Monday, January 7, 2008

Not For Publication I

From the cleaning out the email inbox department: Despite most journalists disdain for such an amateur hour section, Letters To The Editor are very well read and very popular amongst readers (how unusual for journalists to have disdain for something that interests readers?). There is a perennial Sydney Morning Herald letter writer called Rosemary O'Brien - famous and marked by her caustic wit, narrow mind and malapropisms par excellence. Rose is one of those people that just doesn't get modern society. One of those people, as ubiquitous as fibro, who think they're above the hoi-polloi and have a withering, destructive and somewhat small view of their fellow human beings. In short she's a dumb as dogshit conservative jack-ass! I wrote the Herald in December following her commenting on her fear that myths develop from people not being reminded of peoples true characters. I replied:

-----Original Message----- From: Methuselah Sent: Wednesday, 12 December 2007 12:46 AM To: SMH Letters Mail Subject: Letter to Ed Don't worry Rosemary O'Brien (Letters, December 12), as someone who has been reading your mendacious tosh for years, I'll take great satisfaction in reminding people of it for decades to come - just so any myths don't get out of hand.

And I received this reply


Hi Methuselah

Even though this wins my unofficial Letter of the Week award, I don't
want to encourage a general slanging match between and about
correspondents (especially Rosemary O'Brien) so I'm afraid I won't be
publishing it. But thanks a lot for sending it.

Letters co-editor
 

Friday, December 14, 2007

I Feel Like A...

The following is completely unpublishable, but suitable for the Public Record. A good source assures that the following is true:
  • Many, many years ago, a leading Australian journalist at the time, fancied a colleague, a fellow female journalist, and proposed they consummate his feelings towards her. Deadlines being deadlines, the fellow journalist rejected his solicitations, and continued pounding away at the typewriter; whereupon Lothario suggested that he would be happy to consummate this act whilst she continued writing, as long as she adopted a conducive position for such amity. The amended request was also refused.
  • At another occasion the same household name launched himself, with the aid of a few drinks, onto a table at a well frequented establishment in Canberra, and announced with vigour: "Who wants to fuck the smallest dick in Australia!"
  • Despite these imputations, it is further alleged this wordsmith, who shares this lifestyle with a marriage, has managed to conduct the World Rooting Championships in his hotel room, as at least one Sydney Morning Herald cadet can attest.
My inscrutable sources provide a wonderful insight into the upstanding character imbued in those who chose to keep their integrity from the light of day.

Friday, November 30, 2007

Another Ostrich

Peter Hartcher joins the queue of the clueless in today's Sydney Morning Herald, flailing around as to why we kicked Howard out because of the myth that this is a 'booming' economy. The economy is NOT booming for most of us - we are just getting deeper in debt. The Australian Bureau of Statistics has pointed out that one in five households earns less than $20,000 a year, with half earning less than $37,000. What sort of economic boom do you celebrate when half the country is on $700 a week or less? It was the Your Rights At Work Campaign stupid: When 12,500 people mobilise on an issue they will change a government, as the Your Rights At Work Campaign did. Now, can all the commentators take a deep breath and stop trying to rewrite history; and can journalists be forced to spend some time in the real world please?

Thursday, November 29, 2007

How To Build An Imbecile II

The rewriting of history continues apace this week with the latest theory given oxygen being Christian Kerr's assertion over at Crikey that it was all the Lindsay fake-flyer business what won it for Rudd. Yeah, that makes sense. A campaign involving 180,000 ordinary Australians shifts 5.6 percent of the vote, but really it was just a crazed Dentist from Penrith. Christian likes to think he's ever so witty, with the occasional bon-mot sprinkled amid the whacky myths he likes to popularise, but usually he's about as funny as a dead baby's doll - and another good example of how even alternative journalism is riddled with the same pretentious plummy prats that clog up the mainstream media. Unaccountable, unreliable, self-serving and - as this instance shows - often just plain wrong. For those that came in late, it was the Your Rights At Work campaign that won it - along with the thousands of ordinary Australians that got off their arses and did something about WorkChoices. But the politics industry can't be seen to thank them, there's no billable hours in that.

How To Build An Imbecile

Miranda Devine, who gets on in life because her dad was drunken incompetent newspaper hack Frank Devine, really shows just how much the Australian neo-conservatives are lost at sea following Howard's loss last Saturday. Her column in today's Sydney Morning Herald is part attempt to rewrite history, part attempt to airbrush the failings of the Liberal party and mostly just the sort of inane dribble that can only occur if one spends large amount of time with one's head squeezed inside John Howard's fundament. The idea that Howard's vicious pandering to narrow minded racism is some kind of an 'achievement' is one of the more bizarre reads of recent history. Well, Miranda lost, and she can join the queue marked Irrelevant Jibberers right behind Gerard Henderson.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Rewriting History

"It's time for a new page to be written in our nation's history." Kevin Rudd, November 24, 2007.

In the lead up to the 2007 Federal Election tens of thousands of ordinary Australians mobilised into a concerted campaign to change a government. These people re-wrote Australian history.

Yet, as soon as that victory was achieved, their efforts were all but ignored by, not just vast swathes of the media, but also by the ultimate beneficiaries, the incoming government.

The strength of the Your Rights At Work campaign comes from its acknowledgement by the defeated Liberal Party - federal director, Brian Loughnane, told media on the Sunday after the election that Work Choices had cost the Coalition key support, a statement echoed by Liberal MP and campaign spokesman, Andrew Robb.

ALP campaign director Tim Gartrell described WorkChoices as “the most important issue of the campaign”.

“It would have been more difficult to win without it.”

"I mean look at these young guys at the gate - you'd have been dragging them in here to vote last time,” said Graham Perrett, ALP Candidate for Moreton, while visiting a polling booth on election day. "This time they're here handing out cards on the rights at work issue.”

In the marginal seat of Eden-Monaro big swings were recorded in communities west of the great divide where WorkChoices was seen as a threat.

Polling done for the ACTU showed a 5.7% shift from Howard to Labor motivated by industrial relations as the key issue.

None of this would have happened without a concerted grass roots campaign - this was no astroturfing exercise - that saw the ACTU gather an email database of 180,000 addresses, from which a popular localised word of mouth campaign spread.

For over two years the Your Rights At Work campaign has been beavering away, under the radar, in 24 targeted coalition held seats.

Whether leafleting, letterboxing, doorknocking, forwarding emails, holding a street stall or collecting signatures, an army of campaigners braved everything from Darwin’s tropical storms to the snows of the Great Dividing Range to make sure that the impact of WorkChoices became issue number one across a vast swathe of middle Australians in marginal seats.

The Your Rights at Work bumper stickers, T-shirts and later house signs, became eponymous. These people were shifting voter sentiment where it mattered. Some media dismissed it as a cynical Trade Union scare campaign or stunt at best. The rest ignored it.

But the people involved in the campaign came from an extraordinary array of union and non-union backgrounds. There were the usual suspects, but there were more, many more, that became involved in a community campaign for the first time in their lives.

Many of these people took to it with a gusto lacking in the rank and file of both major parties. This is a newly politicised group of Australians, and they threw up some amazing champions.

One such example was Jo Jacobson, an articulate and savvy health worker who became the public face of the opposition to WorkChoices in the Penrith based seat of Lindsay long before the ALP had even settled on a candidate.

Many campaigners took to one-on-one conversations with their peers. In marginal Macquarie a ripped off hotel worker named Steve Eisenberger made a habit of wearing his Your Rights At Work T-shirt around his blue-collar mates - winning over a small coterie who had previously backed Howard over what are euphemistically referred to as ‘security’ issues.

There were thousands of Steve Eisenburgers operating across all sorts of groups - social, sporting, civic and cultural - to get the message out.

The word of mouth message cut through to an increasing number of Australians while Howard and Barbara Bennett remained as background white noise, drowned out by the wise words of their Your Rights At Work neighbour and their own experiences.

The community campaign was backed up by a shoestring (compared to the Federal Government’s) advertising campaign that re-enforced the word-of-mouth message.

Despite (or possibly because of) widespread support, many Your Rights At Work signs were stolen or defaced, as well as threats and acts of vandalism aimed at Your Rights At Work activists.

Still, the thousands of volunteers didn’t complain - instead they handed out their own How To Vote card on election day, separate from the major parties - in the rain, the sun, the heat, the wind. They made sure that WorkChoices was on the forefront of voter’s minds where it mattered.

Of the 24 targeted coalition held seats, the ALP won 20 and 3 are currently too close to call.

It’s an extraordinary achievement in anyone’s reckoning - so where is the acknowledgement to these Australians by either the media or the man holding the trophy, Kevin Rudd?

There was no direct mention of either WorkChoices or the Your Rights At Work campaign in the Hawker-Brittonesque pfaff that passed as Rudd’s acceptance speech.

Not much of a run in the media either. A bit of a go over at the SMAge, with Andrew West providing a bit of background in the SMH and a puff piece on the ACTU’s spin-doctors in the Age, while Mark Bahnisch and Wayne Errington in Crikey both nominated WorkChoices as a killer issue for the Coalition.

The last time a Prime Minister lost his seat - Stanley Melbourne Bruce in 1929 - it was to the secretary of the Victorian Trades Hall in a foretaste of the Your Rights At Work Campaign.

One of the key issues in 1929 was Bruce’s dream of smashing the union movement and regulated working arrangements based on fairness.

Australia said no to individual contracts in droves, and there was a landslide win to Labor. The depression hit and two years later Scullin’s Labor Government dissolved into dissent, panic and scandal.

The Rudd Government will now be faced with a plethora of conflicting policy objectives - one of which will be to screw down the price of labour. We all know that this will be borne by those least able to afford a cut in their living standards.

As early as the Sunday morning after the election Australian Business Council head Greg Bailey dismissed “fears” the union movement may hold sway over a Rudd government.

“If you listened to Kevin Rudd last night that is not an impression you would have got,” Bailey told the ABC, while over at Forbes Magazine CommSec chief equities economist Craig James said the Australian business community had been prepared for a Labor victory.

“In terms of economic policy, nothing really changes too much,” said James, in an observation that would have been news last week.

Rudd was on the 7.30 report blaming the Liberals “from day one” for threatening to be obstructive over repealing WorkChoices. They’ve already set up the fall guy and an alibi - the Senate.

Labor is said to be keen to recall Parliament to introduce its legislation to change the Howard Government's Work Choices laws, but just how keen remains to be seen.

"I hate to say it, but Costello was right when he said the new government will start rewriting history," Unions NSW secretary John Robertson told the SMH on Monday. "It's already begun and Rudd and company are out there saying it was health or education or climate change. Sure, it was a bit of all those, but the biggest issue was Work Choices."

I got a nice email from Sharan Burrow and Jeff Lawrence at the ACTU for my support for the Your Rights At Work campaign.

”Well done,” they said. “You have helped make history.”

Just like those who took on Stanley Melbourne Bruce did nearly eighty years ago.

Yes, Kevin Rudd - and the media - appears to want to write a new page in Australia’s History - a page where it is as if the tens of thousands of ordinary hard working Australians, who banded together as the Your Rights At Work Campaign and changed a government, never existed.

But after the success of our campaign so far, we are highly unlikely to go away.